Mr. Murdoch: Take Down That (mental) Wall on the Street where you Journal

Posted on by
Reply

If schoolchildren were – actually, continue to be – pressured, judged and fearful of being humiliated-or-idolized like ‘American Idol’ contestants, as you describe in your WSJ article, “If Schools Were Like ‘American Idol’ …”, U.S. culture would degrade to ”Survival of the Fittest’ mode, morally regress to a ‘It’s a Dog Eat Dog World’ and devolve us back to the ‘Reptilian Mind state of consciousness’.

Instead of progressing markets, continuing the ‘Bull in a Chinashop’ attitude towards children will regress us towards economic inequity beyond our  ’Worst Nightmare’.

‘No Childhood Left’ is the unintended consequence of our industrialized, Race to Nowhere, education system. Our ‘High Expectations’ actually lead to the ‘Lowlife” because they are ‘Childhood Illiterate, Extreme and Ineffective’.
And that’s because the same reptilian brain mindset that designed the system is trying to fix the system.   When a plan to reform a system comes from within the system, one can only hasten its extinction, not it’s evolution. One cannot change a paradigm from within the paradigm. One cannot reform red with red. When we conceive of a plan to reform the educational system, to evolve it, the evolutionary process will be either progressive or retrogressive. The process of reform will either lead us to a higher stage of the public education system, or will cause the system to degenerate, and gradually to die and become extinct.
The ‘Winner Take All and Devil Take the Hindmost’ idea is not actually a forward-directed evolutionary thought.  Whether unions or reformers hold out, the result will be the same: we are preparing to conclude the evolution of public education at this present stage because the ideas behind it lead us backwards. No matter how hard we swim, we are ‘Swimming Against the Current’ and the system will continue to degenerate into the ‘Foodfight’ it already is. ‘Survival of the Fittest’ thinking cannot take us where we want to go any more than we can actually ‘Pull a Rabbit Out of a Hat’. ‘Factory-Farming’ and ‘Production-Line’ thinking will not give us the mental acuity, social equality or economic equity we seek.
Our present ‘Sink or Swim’ industrial-age education system – and it’s ‘Mental Botox’ way of defining successful learning and teaching ‘By the Numbers’  - was not designed to develop the ‘New, Evolved Higher Brain’ for 21st Century Skills: ”think creatively and critically, to work cooperatively, and to adapt to the evolving use of information and communications technology in business and society”. Actual learning requires a system designed for ‘Mind Over Matter’, to ‘Handle Complexity’ and ‘Be Comfortable With Paradox’.
The next evolution of our education system will be a holistic system designed for the way the ‘Higher Mind’ works – the way networked systems work.
The holistic education system is one in which -n the words of Rudolf Steiner, “a more mature reflection interposes itself between the external impression and that which finally leads to action. From the stimulus comes rational reflection, not just re-action.” The ‘Holistic Education System’ , ‘Slow Government’ (hey, just made that up; future blog.), and ‘Income Equity’* will become instrument of a richer human experience.

*Props to Christopher Schaefer for an ingenious discussion of how the stress and humiliation of economic inequity destroys health, hope and happiness. All this journalistic goodness is layered between reviews of The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett and Somebodies and Nobodies by Robert Fuller in his article, “The Unfinished Business of Healthcare and the Fundamental Social Law”. Chris is in the process of establishing the ‘Hawthorn Research Institute’ with Gary Lamb in an effort to create a think tank to empirically examine the potential efficacy of Rudolf Steiner’s ‘Fundamental Social Law‘ and principles for today’s economic crisis.



Waiting for … Handwriting

Posted on by
Reply

As my ‘Waldorf’-educated kids  wrote and drew their way through year after year of handwritten and hand-illustrated ‘main lesson books’ in their 12 years of this schooling, we often wondered when the research supporting the value of all this effort would arrive on the main stage.

Enter:

“How Handwriting Makes You Smarter/How Handwriting Trains the Brain: Forming Letters is Key to Learning, Memory, Ideas” by Gwendolyn Bounds, WSJ, Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Chris Lehman says, “This Isn’t An Education Debate” , and he’s right.  Debating charters, uniforms, test scores or any structural factor is meaningless unless and until we first understand how a child actually learns to think critically, to construct emotional resilience and to make new things that work.

The achievement trap, another inconvenient truth

Posted on by
Reply

Go the the website for the “Race to Nowhere: The Dark Side of America’s Achievement Culture”. Watch the three-minute trailer.  Look for a screening near you.  Heck, organize a screening. It’s a documentary film by a parent, Vicki Abeles, for parents, educators and anyone with an empathetic heart about the staggering increases in homework kids get and the resulting sleep deprivation, sedentary lifestyle and depression – even suicide – among kids who pick up on the pressure to ‘excel’, ‘succeed’, ‘achieve’ and ‘win’. This is the other side of the ‘achievement gap’.  This is the ‘achievement trap’.

Education as shared common good: In Praise of Elinor Ostrom

Posted on by
1

Does public education have to morph into more of a distributed rather than centralized system in order to become truly representative of the “public”? I have always thought so. But, how to make the case without seeming to overlook those who will be elbowed out? Recently, to my delight, my faith in the unconditional wisdom of everyone was scientifically and economically validated when  Elinor Ostrom won a Nobel for her “new science of governance for a new age” by applying  the “practical economics” (“A Nobel for Practical Economics” of voluntary associations and communal ownership to protecting the shared common good. I apply her logic to education.

No. Ms. Ostrom doesn’t mention education per se. But, given that an exuberant, well-loved, and healthy childhood is a common good that deserves shared protection, allow me to make the leap from the governance of our shared natural resources like fisheries and grazing grounds to the governance of our shared human capital like teachers, parents and students.

Ms. Ostrom’s research finds that natural resources and the common good are best protected by local, knowledgeable, voluntary associations with rules designed by enlightened locals to fit a “local ecology”.  Distant, publicly regulated entities or privately owned for-profit markets do NOT protect the shared common good better than local enlightened and invested associations. Ms. Ostrom’s work lays to rest “the tragedy of the commons”, the long-held justification for distant authorities to regulate locals for the sake of the common good because, so the theory goes, locals can’t be trusted to protect the common good due to greed, politics and ignorance. Hmm.

The opposite turns out to be true.  Locals actually are BEST at protecting the common good because local knowledge leads to rules that make sense and work for local conditions.

The solutions proposed by the WSJ education task-force assume the opposite of Elinor Ostrom’s conclusions. The CEO’s of the WSJ education task-force assume that the social and moral responsibility for the public education system rests solely with government and business. No teacher, parent or student is on the task-force.  The only references to teachers, parents and students are as distant, problem-persons to be “rewarded”, “denied”, “removed”, “educated about consequences”, and “mobilized”. The overriding belief of the moderator and the task-force appears to be that government and business are wiser, more responsible and more innovative and productive than the single teacher, parent or student.

This is not true. Government and business are NOT wiser, more moral and more entrepreneurial that the single individual teacher, parent or student. The single individual is at least as, if not more so, wise, moral and entrepreneurial than government-regulated authorities and privately-owned markets. Systems, in modern times, have to be designed around trusting the individual, not to make the individual dependent on a system.

Looking through the lens of Ms. Ostrom’s research that small & local is wisest, more moral and more protective and entreprneurial, we see that the WSJ moderator and task-force solutions assume “the tragedy of the commons”. Our current education system thinking assumes that the single, individual teacher, parent or student are lazy unless prodded with “high expectations” and matching rewards and punishments made up by distant authorities.

Applying Ms. Ostrom’s research, I invite the WSJ task-force to consider five alternative recommentations.

An Educated I N D I V I D U A L: The Top Five Alternative Recommendations

1. INDIVIDUALIZING EDUCATION IS OUR TOP PRIORITY. Given that 25 years of standardized. “outcomes-based” education has given the nation and business “alot of subprime … human capital”, “dismal graduation rates”, “teachers bailing out of the profession”, “parents frantic”, “student performance [that] pales next to competition abroad”, and “business [that] can’t find the talent it needs in the work force that our education system produces” let us stop and think about policies to support small, local enlightened associations of teachers, parents and students instead doubling down on more of this obviously failing strategy. If what’s working are small, “pockets of excellence” then let us create a system that encourages a network of many small pockets of excellence.

2. LOCAL COUNCILS OF ENLIGHTENED INDIVIDUALS. Invest resources in cultivating local wisdom, social responsibility and entrepreneurship.  The charter movement is a perfect example.  One law allowed for many flowers to bloom and then it began self-organzing.  The only hold-up is distant regulators creating bottle necks and stalling improvisation. When Districts start to support schools, rather than schools propping up Districts, change will be here.

3. CREATE EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS OF EDUCATION.  Invest in the input and you have to invest less in crying over the output. Schools of education need to tie research into children’s cognitive, emotional and physical development into how to teach and what to teach and when to teach it.  Working with the child, rather than against the child, will prove to be the magic bullet. Schools of education ought to connect with schools to create feedback loop of ongoing learning and experimentation between teacher education and teacher classroom experience.

4. TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF EDUCATION FROM GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS TO SCHOOLS OF EDUCATION & WORLD-CLASS CORPS OF TEACHING PROFESSIONALS. As long as distant authorities treat teachers, parents and students as threats to the shared intellectual commons, this will be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Business has demonstrated these last 25 years or so that flattening the governance and trusting in the brilliance of the individual makes the business smarter and faster and more fun.  And it makes the trusted person actually brighter! Instead of going backward and dreaming up more layers of regulation, let business ring the bell for a local, distributed network of entrepreneurial and self-organizing networks of teachers, parents and students linked up with universities.  Then we will be a collective, national “learning organization”.

5. INITIATIVE TO TELL THE EXTENDED PRE-NATAL – HIGH SCHOOL STORY OF ENLIGHTENED PARENTING. Get IDEO to think of a way to do this. Youtube, social networking, neighborhood meet-ups – Make “Parent For America” part of the “Teach for America” agenda — brainstorm, brainstorm … Get IDEO together with Po Bronson’ Nurture Shock, Waldorf early-childhood educators, others. Make if fascinating and entertaining like Annie Leonard’s “Story of Stuff”.

If government and business continues to make and recomment policies that empower distant authorities over empowering individual persons, we will not only not evolve as a social organism, we will go backwards. Witness this summer’s eruption of mental and emotionally-challenged town-hall meetings. From this point forward, we evolve one enlightened person at a time.  We get enlightened by being personally responsible, not just being “held accountable” with carrots and sticks by external and distant authorities.  The days of distant authorities getting between the wisdom of the local parent, child and teacher unit is over.

25 years of Big Standardization, Big Education Industry, Big Union Outcomes-Based Education, RIP.
25 years of Small, Local Personal Responsibility-Based Education, Hello.

3 Game-Changing FACTS about public schools "inspired" by Waldorf education:

Posted on by
5

http://www.edutopia.org/waldorfinspired-public-schools-are-rise


Some MYTHS about Waldorf education continue to straggle on …
By Joan Jaeckel

((1))MYTH: Waldorf education is based on religion or some new age notion of spiritual truth (and did I mention quackery?). FACT: Waldorf education’s curriculum, methods and attitudes are best described as based on objectivity that comports with the most interesting and useful research questions and ideas of our time. Waldorf education is based on evolutionary consciousness, humanly-moral values and social and environmental ecology.

Yes, (shockingly) Waldorf educators like many if not most people who care about people and the planet hold a “spiritual” worldview. Simply means that there are things going on in the universe that affect us, which we account for, even if we don’t (yet) fully understand how it all works or why. Not afraid to say this since, obviously, concepts like “ideas”, “morality” and ”ecology” are not material objects but words for spiritual concepts. Heck, even gravity is an invisible force which we don’t understand. How does consciousness work? Cognitive scientists want to know. Let’s not pretend in our schools that all the questions have been settled once and for all by either traditional religion or traditional science.

As a matter of fact the process of being “educated” is inner development. Even when we try our damndest to pull the education rabbit out of the Scranton hat we know we’re only fooling ourselves. The real deal is invisible.

Furthermore, the institution of public education itself is based on a spiritual worldview. Public education holds the spiritual worldview that every child has the right to an education. Waldorf education holds this same worldview. In a nutshell, the contribution that Waldorf education wishes to make to 21st Century learning could be described like this:

“We hold this truth to be self-evident that every child is a mysterious and unique individual hell-bent on manifesting the gift he or she wishes to give to the world. Education’s job is to help him or her know that this is so, to find it, and to acquire the mental discipline, the social-emotional sensitivity and the practical skill-sets to become fit to be it, live it, give it”.  

Scarrreeeee. Really?  

((2))MYTH: Waldorf education violates the principle of separation of church and state, when it is practiced in public schools, because its spiritual world view of evolutionary consciousness, humanly-moral values and social and environmental ecology interweave every lesson. FACT: And this is bad, why? U.S. institutions, ideally, embody a spiritual worldview or truths. Our spiritual worldview or truths include “all men [humans] are created equal” and the “right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. The principles of freedom, democracy and equality interweave all of our U.S. institutions. Despite this spiritual worldview we continue to consider ourselves a secular society. As a matter of fact these spiritual truths are so fragile and evaporative that they don’t even really exist at all … except in practice. We do freedom, do democracy, do equality.

With the claim, “these truths are self-evident”, America took an objective, moral and evolutionary stance about the value and dignity of human existence, human life and human aspiration.  These are “spiritual” truths, a spiritual worldview, because they were not discovered in a lab using the traditional scientific method.  No one sat in a bathtub, noticed his ass displacing water and yelled “Eureka!”  These spiritual truths became suddenly obvious.  It simply occurred to a critical mass of humans one fine day that “we hold these truths of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to be self-evident”. Self-evident = obvious, “proof” not possible. No one can convince you of their truthfulness and reality.  You either see it or you don’t. If we wish, we could say that Steiner had his eureka moment when he realized that every human has the capacity for a Eureka moment. Everyone can expand their mind, develop an inner moral compass, and live to give their gift - regardless of their social station in life.

Our current victories and crises are all victories and crises of the spirit. Human beings possess the capacity to evolve through personal inner spiritual effort. Best of all, anyone can do it and it costs nothing. Waldorf education proposes that having an inner life going on in your head is simply human and not religious any more than “the pursuit of happiness” is religious. Viewing each student as a gift to unwrap rather than a problem to solve is the educational magic wand we have been looking for these 25 years since “A Nation At Risk”.  Committing to personal inner development of our innate human intelligence is Waldorf’s big eureka-moment idea. Scientists call it neuroplasticity. Is that so wrong?

((3))MYTH:  Steiner’s so-called “spiritual science” is an oxymoron and his anthroposophy is a cult.  FACT: Describing what he does, Rudolf Steiner repeatedly said “I don’t teach. I relate what I have inwardly experienced”. He called his process of investigation “spiritual science” because he used the invisible tools of thinking, imagination, inspiration and intuition to explore the invisible properties of reality. That’s all Steiner’s anthroposophy is. Him bad. No wonder Steiner so admired Albert Einstein (that very very bad religious nut) and his theory of relativity which equates invisible energy with visible matter. 

From this perspective, every human being who thinks, who has feelings, and who does stuff is a spiritual scientist – especially if we stop and look back at moral consequences. That’s not religiosity. It’s being responsible.  Waldorf education is part of a larger societal evolution towards “stumbling on happiness” and living “lifestyles of health and sustainability”.

We have safely landed in supra-consciousness land. The story of human moral aspiration and the story of material evolution have met up. It is no longer controversial to see science and spirituality skipping down humanity’s ongoing quest for meaning and knowledge together. It’s time our educational system mirrors this relationship. We need an educational HYBRID that allows the smarts of both science and life’s mysteries to co-exist and co-evolve. Given that public education has given all children a right to an education, how will we shift public education in modern times to give all children a meaningful education?  That is THE question.


The other "climate change"

Posted on by
Reply
You can’t fool the kids. The next big shift for the educational system is emotional climate change in schools.
The psychological weather in children’s schools and classrooms needs to move from an atmosphere of competition to an atmosphere of collaboration. Have we forgotten that kids pick up on the emotional climate between adults? Mitchell Landsberg in “Birmingham High Goes Charter” writes that students, when asked by their victorious principal on the first day of their school re-opening as an independent charter school, “are you guys excited?”, responded with “No!”. A clue to their seemingly ungrateful and oblivious behaviour lies, I think, in the school climate adults created during the transition: Mr. Landsberg reports adults saying things like, “offended by accusations”, “it hurts”, “losing my best friends, and I would feel uncomfortable talking to them now”, and “[what drove me out was] the quality of the people … in this school”. Just like kids pick up on bickering at home, students pick up on bickering at school. Ironically, the piece is illustrated with an image of two students embracing, obviously excited about each other. No climate change needed! The school climate will change when “unions” make allowances for choice and “reformers” make allowances for children, teachers and parents . The students are always right on.

J O A N . J A E C K E L and E R I C . U T N E Calling for the Transformation of Education Through Developmentally-Intelligent Design THE 4 TRENDS

Posted on by
Reply

Guest Editorial Reprinted from GREEN MONEY JOURNAL winter08/09

In this issue we’re making the case that, society-wide, things are getting better because of four positive education macro-trends:
  • Holism
  • Inner Growth
  • Civil Society, and
  • The Learning Organization

Even our highly industrialized and regimented educational system which standardizes, alienates and instills helplessness in students, is being transformed into one that instead protects and nurtures children’s growing minds.

In our view, we’re not just at a crisis point; we’re at a threshold of opportunity.
There’s no one to blame, no good old days to go back to, nothing to fix or save. Why would we want to fix or save a Model T? The old educational paradigm was revolutionary in its time and today, not so much.
The 15 Inspired Educational Transformers in this special issue of GreenMoney Journal describe the first steps to a new, civilized educational paradigm-a shift away from systematically making children feel that there is something wrong with them towards a culture of developmentally intelligent learning.
We question the outdated industrial-age framing of education as a commodity-pretending that minds are empty vessels to be filled and measured, rather than fires to be ignited (see articles by Arthur Zajonc and Betty Staley).
The paradigm is shifting. New, flexible, self-organizing approaches to learning run less on rigidity and more on plasticity (like our “neuroplastic” brains say Linda Lantieri and Jane Healy). These new approaches can be recognized and evaluated without invoking “rigor” (as in “knuckle crunching,” “tough,” and “mortis”) Deborah Meier and Ingrid O’Brien suggest. Plasticizing experiences like the arts (Gayle Davis), nature (Richard Louv) and working with animals (William Crain) train our minds to think clearly and flexibly, while seeing with wondering eyes and compassionate hearts.
We noticed that the four positive education macro-trends correspond to the four positive cultural macro-trends which account for the Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability (LOHAS) sector: being Green, socially responsible business, investment and philanthropy, meditation and contemplation (with neuro-scientifically proven benefits!), and conscientious individuals as a new sector, “the cultural sector” or “civil society.” The conscientious educator takes the social change lead (see articles by Ron Miller and Ocean Robbins).
A civilized educational system moves public education and private education to the next level of cooperation. We can cultivate people who weave originality, community, and service into civilization’s fabric from generation to generation, as Joan Almon so movingly describes. Like cradle-to-cradle manufacturing, generation-to-generation education doesn’t end with graduation. The developmentally intelligent educator is a cultural healer who first, does no harm, (see article by Deborah Meier), wastes no lives, and returns bright, loving and enterprising “nutrients” into the social soil. Let us step up with confidence and be like Betty Staley, Sonja Williams and Elizabeth Goodenough!
We gratefully acknowledge over a decade of support for whole childhood from Susan Kendall Newman/Paul Newman-Newman’s Own with gratitude.
Finally we thank you, Cliff and the GreenMoney Journal team for opening your pages and treasured readers to these views.
As the election is over and nation-building begins in America, please forward this issue to everyone you know and start a conversation!
Here at GreenMoney.com you will find an expanded online version of the special education issue including an exclusive article by Ocean Robbins, founder of Youth For Environmental Sanity (YES!).
- Joan Jaeckel and Eric Utne, Guest Editors
Joan Jaeckel is a thought-change activist for social transformation through intelligent human design. Email: joan.jaeckel@gmail.com and website: http://www.whole.org
Eric Utne founded the Utne Reader and is an educational innovator and social entrepreneur. Website: http://www.earthcouncils.org 
Dedication: 
This issue is dedicated to the Ten Civil Societarians who are exemplary friends of Childhood and Youth:
  1. Geoffrey Canada, Harlem Children’s Zone
  2. Van Jones, author of Green For All: Building a Green Collar Economy
  3. Dave Eggers, 826 Valencia
  4. Rachael Kessler, PassageWays Institute
  5. David Orr, Center for EcoLiteracy
  6. Deborah Solomon, Resources for Infant Educarers (RIE)
  7. Wayne Jennings, The International Association for Learning Alternatives
  8. Steve Bonchek, Harmony Education Center
  9. Craig Kielberger, O Ambassadors
  10. Sir Ken Robinson‘s TED talk, “Do Schools Kill Creativity?”